Re: Which Stick method to start with?
mad_monk wrote:
Hi Greg,
Of course it isn't fair to lump all the instructors together. What I mean is that the standard model for Stick music is basically combining chords or arpeggios in one hand and melody in the other, is that not so? The Grand Staff does not recognize this jazz-derived concept...harmonies in polyphonic music are created by both hands playing melodic material simultaneously. That's why I say it is the other distinct method, as opposed to the relatively unified approach that everyone is currently using.
Mad Monk.
Hi Randy,
I think you're right, but I'd say its not quite so cut-and-dried. There are quite a few players (Larry Tuttle comes to mind) who play melodic lines in the left hand as well. And you could argue that when a bass line is being played that is not an arpeggiated chord, that's a rock or jazz equivalent of what you're talking about. It's not usually expressed in written form, more of an "aural tradition"
. I'm thinking of Paul McCartney's bass lines on songs like "A Day in the Life". He was a great composer. Tony is a great composer as well. His basslines really stand up.
I could be stretching the point, though. Comparing classical music with jazz and rock feels like it will only get me so far. But then I recall Cides's music, or Glenn Poorman's, or Mattias Betti's or any number of proggy Stick players. The left hand is often sketching out melodic lines, not playing chords.
Your use of the term "polyphonic music" is very specific. so maybe you could elaborate a bit on what you mean. There's a generic understanding of "polyphonic" that's come from synthesizer technology that simply means "more than one note", so that could be confusing to people in this context.
And to your comment, TT#2, about the word
method, I have no trouble believing that you have no use for methods of any kind, "rhythm" or otherwise.