Re: What Carl Orff Might Do with the Stick in Education Sett
The OP's idea of using Sticks (as opposed to rhythm sticks, which are already used
) in elementary music education is initially intriguing. There are some quandaries, however.
I should insert the disclaimer that I am
not a music teacher, but my wife taught elementary music for several years. Part of her curriculum included Orff methods.
The closest in-practice application of the OP's idea is the commonly-seen (and oft-maligned) autoharp, where a student presses a button with one hand to set the chord and strums the strings with the other hand.
The Orff idea relies on barring, which is still a bit more of a traditional guitar method. The one really useful thing about the stick is that the string tension is so low as for it to be plausible for a youngster to get it to effectively sound. My kids could generate some decent tones from my NS/Stick fairly effortlessly. Point, Stick.
I think one difficulty in teaching beginning/primary level music theory on a stringed instrument is there's almost two many options for voicing the same chord. Much of primary music pedagogy relies on the keyboard (and often only a single tetrachord or scale), which only has one occurrence of a given note. The ability of playing the same note on a different part of the fretboard, which is a blessing and provides flexibility for us, may very well be a liability when you're trying to distill music theory down to it's most basic elements for understanding.
Another difficulty with using a Stick in such a setting is cost. Even with the wonderfully more accessible railboards, for a class of 10 students you're talking $16,500, not including some kind of amplification for those instruments.
Now, barring these difficulties, there may still be some interesting possibilities with the idea--and I realize I'm not being particularly creative with how a Stick might be useful in other aspects of the pedagogy. Any elementary educators want to chime in?